When do improved covariance matrix estimators enhance portfolio optimization? An empirical comparative study of nine estimators

Ester Pantaleo, Michele Tumminello, Fabrizio Lillo and Rosario Mantegna

Quantitative Finance, 2011, vol. 11, issue 7, 1067-1080

Abstract: The use of improved covariance matrix estimators as an alternative to the sample estimator is considered an important approach for enhancing portfolio optimization. Here we empirically compare the performance of nine improved covariance estimation procedures using daily returns of 90 highly capitalized US stocks for the period 1997-2007. We find that the usefulness of covariance matrix estimators strongly depends on the ratio between the estimation period T and the number of stocks N, on the presence or absence of short selling, and on the performance metric considered. When short selling is allowed, several estimation methods achieve a realized risk that is significantly smaller than that obtained with the sample covariance method. This is particularly true when T/N is close to one. Moreover, many estimators reduce the fraction of negative portfolio weights, while little improvement is achieved in the degree of diversification. On the contrary, when short selling is not allowed and T > N, the considered methods are unable to outperform the sample covariance in terms of realized risk, but can give much more diversified portfolios than that obtained with the sample covariance. When T < N, the use of the sample covariance matrix and of the pseudo-inverse gives portfolios with very poor performance.

Keywords: Portfolio optimization; Correlation structures; Statistical methods; Econophysics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (28)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14697688.2010.534813 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: When do improved covariance matrix estimators enhance portfolio optimization? An empirical comparative study of nine estimators (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:quantf:v:11:y:2011:i:7:p:1067-1080

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RQUF20

DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2010.534813

Access Statistics for this article

Quantitative Finance is currently edited by Michael Dempster and Jim Gatheral

More articles in Quantitative Finance from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().