Default probability estimation in small samples--with an application to sovereign bonds

Walter Orth

Quantitative Finance, 2013, vol. 13, issue 12, 1891-1902

Abstract: In small samples and especially in the case of small true default probabilities, standard approaches to credit default probability estimation have certain drawbacks. Most importantly, standard estimators display high variability and tend to underestimate the true default probability, which are clearly undesirable properties from the perspective of prudent risk management. As an alternative, we present an empirical Bayes approach to default probability estimation and apply the estimator--which is capable of multi-period predictions--to a comprehensive sample of Standard & Poor's rated sovereign bonds. By means of a simulation study, we then show that the empirical Bayes estimator is more conservative and more precise under realistic data-generating processes.

Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2013.792436 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:quantf:v:13:y:2013:i:12:p:1891-1902

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RQUF20

DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2013.792436

Access Statistics for this article

Quantitative Finance is currently edited by Michael Dempster and Jim Gatheral

More articles in Quantitative Finance from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().