Evaluation of volatility predictions in a VaR framework
Alessandra Amendola () and
V. Candila
Quantitative Finance, 2016, vol. 16, issue 5, 695-709
Abstract:
The evaluation of volatility forecasts is not straightforward and some issues can arise. A standard approach relies on statistical loss functions. Another approach bases the evaluation of the volatility predictions on utility functions or Value at Risk (VaR) measures. This work aims to combine the two approaches, using the VaR measures within the loss functions. By means of this method, the VaR measures obtained from a set of competing models are plugged into two loss functions, the magnitude loss function and a proposed new one. This latter loss function more heavily penalizes the models with a number of VaR violations greater than the expected one. The loss function values are evaluated against a benchmark obtained from the inclusion of a consistent estimate of the VaR measures in the loss function. In order to investigate the performance of the proposed method and the new loss function, a Monte Carlo experiment and an empirical analysis of a stock listed on the New York Stock Exchange are provided. The proposed strategy helps with the selection of a superior model, in terms of forecast accuracy, when the cited approaches do not clearly and uniquely identify it. Moreover, the new asymmetric loss function allows a greater discrimination with regard to models, helping to find the best volatility model.
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2015.1062122 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:quantf:v:16:y:2016:i:5:p:695-709
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RQUF20
DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2015.1062122
Access Statistics for this article
Quantitative Finance is currently edited by Michael Dempster and Jim Gatheral
More articles in Quantitative Finance from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().