Peer effects in professional analysts’ choice of their portfolio of companies

Victor Fang, Lutz Honvehlmann and Thomas Lux

Quantitative Finance, 2022, vol. 22, issue 11, 2125-2137

Abstract: Analysts’ earnings forecasts are well known to be affected by herding behavior. This article provides evidence that herding might also play a role in analysts’ choice of coverage portfolio. Using the I/B/E/S database we show that there are strong peer effects at work in analysts’ choice of their portfolio of companies that go beyond specialization in teams and for certain sectors. To identify the factors driving these findings, we adopt a model of link formation within the bipartite network defined by analyst-company pairs. The strongest influence on imitation comes from the performance of other analysts. In contrast, professional experience and other individual characteristics seem to exert only a minor influence.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2022.2119881 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:quantf:v:22:y:2022:i:11:p:2125-2137

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RQUF20

DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2022.2119881

Access Statistics for this article

Quantitative Finance is currently edited by Michael Dempster and Jim Gatheral

More articles in Quantitative Finance from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().