EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Optimal portfolio choice with ESG considerations and asymmetric information

Ying Jiao and Haibo Liu

Quantitative Finance, 2025, vol. 25, issue 7, 1163-1176

Abstract: We study portfolio optimization problems incorporating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors for three types of investors, namely brown investors who care only about their wealth, green investors who prefer assets with high ESG ratings, and mixed investors who take a position between the two. Given that some ESG ratings are not publicly available, we distinguish between different levels of ESG information accessibility for these investors. We explore the impact of ESG preferences and ESG information accessibility on investment strategies, addressing issues such as the components of optimal portfolios of different investors and the utility indifference value of nonpublic ESG information.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2025.2519836 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:quantf:v:25:y:2025:i:7:p:1163-1176

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RQUF20

DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2025.2519836

Access Statistics for this article

Quantitative Finance is currently edited by Michael Dempster and Jim Gatheral

More articles in Quantitative Finance from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-09-05
Handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:25:y:2025:i:7:p:1163-1176