EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Predicting Functional Role and Occurrence of Whitebark Pine (Pinus albicaulis) at Alpine Treelines: Model Accuracy and Variable Importance

Lynn M. Resler, Yang Shao, Diana F. Tomback and George P. Malanson

Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2014, vol. 104, issue 4, 703-722

Abstract: At some alpine treelines in the Rocky Mountains, whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis)—a keystone species—plays a central role in tree island development through facilitation. Whitebark pine occurs both as a solitary tree and also as a component of tree islands, although relative importance of these two patterns varies geographically. We examine the utility of four predictive models to understand how the functional role of a keystone species varies spatially with biophysical conditions. We use a novel data set to predict whitebark pine's functional role, characterized by spatial association and relative position within a tree island at three North American Rocky Mountain treelines. For the study areas combined, and at a study area level, we compared prediction accuracy and variable importance among these modeling approaches: general linear models, classification and regression trees, random forests, and support vector machines. Results revealed that the keystone role of whitebark pine varied spatially. For the combined model, growing season temperature and slope curvature were the most important predictive variables for association and relative position, as revealed by overall agreement among the four models. Prediction accuracy and variable importance varied at the study area level, though, indicating that different conclusions could be drawn from each model, if examined independently. We advocate comparing results from different modeling approaches for complex, field-derived data sets because it might enable a better understanding of model and variable selection and appropriateness of input data resolution. Furthermore, comparative modeling enables assessment of the relative predictive and interpretive capacities of each modeling approach.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00045608.2014.910072 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:104:y:2014:i:4:p:703-722

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/raag21

DOI: 10.1080/00045608.2014.910072

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of the American Association of Geographers is currently edited by Jennifer Cassidento

More articles in Annals of the American Association of Geographers from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:104:y:2014:i:4:p:703-722