Settling for a discount: A review of the pioneer foods price reduction remedy

Liberty Mncube

Agrekon, 2014, vol. 53, issue 1, 26-45

Abstract: With Pioneer Foods admitting to its involvement in milled wheat and milled white maize cartels as well as engaging in general exclusionary conduct, there was little suspense over the existence of most egregious offenses in competition law and the subsequent harm to consumers and competition. For some, the competition law remedies and in particular the discount remedy that was adopted, following confirmation by the Competition Tribunal, constitutes a key measure of "success" for the case(s). This paper evaluates this claim by examining the design and effectiveness of the discount remedy, from a comparative perspective. We find that the period before, during and after the Pioneer Foods discount remedy, was characterised by increasing wheat prices. The discount remedy induced responses from Pioneer Foods' main competitors resulting in even wider gains for consumers than Pioneer Foods' own price reduction commitment.

Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03031853.2014.887904 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ragrxx:v:53:y:2014:i:1:p:26-45

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/ragr20

DOI: 10.1080/03031853.2014.887904

Access Statistics for this article

Agrekon is currently edited by A. Jooste, National Agricultural Marketing Council

More articles in Agrekon from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().