How stable are farmersâ€™ risk perceptions? A follow-up study of one community in the Karoo
Ivo Wustro and
Agrekon, 2020, vol. 59, issue 1, 30-45
Two cohorts of Likert scale risk data were subjected to rigorous principal component analysis to simplify the participantsâ€™ risk rankings. This improves methodologically on the first Karoo risk analysis. More than 80% of the items and two-thirds of the participants overlap in these datasets, which made it possible to study the stability of these perceptions over the four years that elapsed between the surveys. Two-thirds of the items were factorable and the four common factors identified in the first cohort all persisted in the second cohort, which indicates stability. The four items added to the second survey created the opportunity to study how emerging structures differ when the lists change. The principal component analysis conducted on the longer list identified a new common concern about growing government control over private enterprise that came to light as a result of adding four extra items. Predation ranked as the number one risk in both surveys followed by drought. Labour and security were middling risks, market access a low risk and a lack of support from the local cooperative no risk at all.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ragrxx:v:59:y:2020:i:1:p:30-45
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Agrekon is currently edited by A. Jooste, National Agricultural Marketing Council
More articles in Agrekon from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().