Missed opportunities for democratic engagement: the adoption of community indicators in local government
Roberta Ryan and
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 2015, vol. 37, issue 1, 33-43
Community indicators, as a framework for the measurement of community wellbeing and progress established in collaboration with the community itself, have more than three decades of history in the United States. Although community indicator projects developed in Australia from the 1990s onwards, particularly by local governments, they have primarily been used as a reporting tool rather than as an instrument for democratic engagement and evidence-based policy development. In this article, an analysis is provided of the range of approaches to community indicators in Australia and the United States. The argument is made for the use of community indicators to enhance the democratic capacity of local government. The aim is to stimulate discussion about the potential benefits of community indicator projects for local government in Australia and increase understanding of the possible extent of their application.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rapaxx:v:37:y:2015:i:1:p:33-43
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration is currently edited by Ian Thynne and Danny Lam
More articles in Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration from Taylor & Francis Journals
Series data maintained by Chris Longhurst ().