Shared services in Australia: is it not time for some clarity?
Richard Reid and
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 2015, vol. 37, issue 2, 102-114
As a result of the 2014 National Commission of Audit, shared services began to receive increasing attention amongst those involved with Australian public administration. However, little seems to be known about the term and its theoretical origins. In addition to this lack of understanding of what is meant by shared services, the term was also linked with another perennial in public administration: the one-stop shop. The two terms are often confused and the difference between them little understood. This article seeks to provide some clarity to this discussion over shared services and one-stop shops through both an exploration of the evolution of the terms and through a consideration of a variety of Australian case studies. We conclude that the two terms mean very different things and have very different theoretical underpinnings. We also conclude that these concepts are often employed for purely political considerations, and are employed inconsistently with government rhetoric.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rapaxx:v:37:y:2015:i:2:p:102-114
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration is currently edited by Ian Thynne and Danny Lam
More articles in Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration from Taylor & Francis Journals
Series data maintained by Chris Longhurst ().