Policy on the move: how policy advocates have framed the international transfer of Australiaâ€™s asylum seeker policies
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 2018, vol. 40, issue 3, 147-158
When a public policy is actually or potentially moved from one jurisdiction to another, policy advocates seek to shape public debate by discussing the opportunities and risks associated with policy transfer. This is especially the case concerning controversial policies, such as those regarding irregular migration, in response to which international policy commentators argue quite strongly in favour or against. Specifically, this article analyses how policy advocates have framed the international transfer of Australiaâ€™s asylum seeker policies, leading to reflections on the findings in relation to the scholarly debates on policy transfer. The findings demonstrate that the idea of policy transfer can take on a life of its own in policy advocacy documents. The concept of policy transfer is not just a valuable analytic category used in academic discourse; it is also used astutely by advocates for rhetorical purposes, explicitly or implicitly, to argue for or against the movement of policies across jurisdictions.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rapaxx:v:40:y:2018:i:3:p:147-158
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration is currently edited by Ian Thynne and Danny Lam
More articles in Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().