Geosite assessments: comparison of methods and results
L'ubomír Štrba,
Pavol Rybár,
Bartolomej Baláž,
Mário Molokáč,
Ladislav Hvizdák,
Branislav Kršák,
Marián Lukáč,
Lenka Muchová,
Dana Tometzová and
Jarmila Ferenčíková
Current Issues in Tourism, 2015, vol. 18, issue 5, 496-510
Abstract:
Geotourism as a rapidly evolving and attractive tourism form expands into many regions. This ‘new’ tourism form brings new research issues to be solved including, e.g. geosite identification, geosite assessment, geopark establishment, (geo)tourist trail definitions. One of the biggest challenges of researchers not only in the field of geotourism is to set specific value of an individual locality. The aim of this paper is to compare selected assessment methods of geosites. Different quantitative methods were selected due to fact that it is possible to compare final score of assessments. The results show that using different assessment methods on selected localities gives different results and geosite rankings. Based on this fact, further research in the field of geosite assessment is needed for (geo)tourism planning and management as discussed in this paper.
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2014.882885 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:18:y:2015:i:5:p:496-510
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rcit20
DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2014.882885
Access Statistics for this article
Current Issues in Tourism is currently edited by Jennifer Tunstall
More articles in Current Issues in Tourism from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().