Auditing standards reform in 2016 and going-concern audits

Yamin Zeng and Baochun Ma

China Journal of Accounting Studies, 2024, vol. 12, issue 3, 662-692

Abstract: This paper examines the issuance and accuracy of going-concern audit opinions after China’s auditing standards reform in 2016. We find that auditors are more likely to issue a going-concern opinion after the reform and Type II errors (retaining the false) decrease while Type I errors (discarding the true) increase. Further analyses show that the results are related to the change in GCO disclosure location in audit reports resulting from the reform. The new auditing standards strengthen the auditor’s responsibility for going-concern audits and adjust the alternatives of GCO disclosure location in audit reports. In this context, auditors are increasingly willing to communicate less severe going-concern issues in the audit report. Overall, auditors are issuing more going-concern opinions after the auditing standards reform in 2016 and the change in location alternatives affects the accuracy of going-concern opinions.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2025.2482630 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:662-692

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rcja20

DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2025.2482630

Access Statistics for this article

China Journal of Accounting Studies is currently edited by Xiaochen Dou

More articles in China Journal of Accounting Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().