EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

PCAOB inspections, auditor reputation, and Chinese reverse merger frauds

Ran Zhang, Si Chen and Jianfeng Wang

China Journal of Accounting Studies, 2013, vol. 1, issue 3-4, 221-235

Abstract: This paper examines whether Public Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) inspections decrease fraud likelihood in the Chinese reverse merger firms’ accounting crisis and whether auditor reputation moderates this relationship. By analyzing Chinese firms listed in the US stock markets through reverse merger (RM) during 2001–2011, we find that PCAOB inspections significantly decrease accounting fraud likelihood for RM firms, especially for auditors with low reputation. But this relationship does not hold for Chinese initial public offering (IPO) firms listed in the US. The reason may be that 84.68% of IPO firms hire Big 4 accounting firms, whose reputation substitutes for PCAOB inspections. Overall, our results indicate that PCAOB inspections help prevent financial frauds, but only for firms hiring non-Big 4 auditors.

Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697221.2013.857816 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:1:y:2013:i:3-4:p:221-235

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rcja20

DOI: 10.1080/21697221.2013.857816

Access Statistics for this article

China Journal of Accounting Studies is currently edited by Xiaochen Dou

More articles in China Journal of Accounting Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:1:y:2013:i:3-4:p:221-235