Prospect Theory and Terrorist Choice

Peter Phillips and Gabriela Pohl

Journal of Applied Economics, 2014, vol. 17, issue 1, 139-160

Abstract: We study terrorist choice from the perspective of economics and psychology. Using RAND-MIPT data about the injuries and fatalities inflicted by different terrorist attack methods, we compute sets of preference orderings over the attack methods using prospect theory. This incorporates reference point dependence, risk seeking in the domain of losses, risk aversion in the domain of gains, non-linear preferences and loss aversion into an analysis of terrorist behaviour. We pay particular attention to the importance of a reference point in the context of ‘copycat’ acts of violence and the influence of loss aversion on the choice of attack method. Our results provide an indication of the types of attack methods that would be chosen by a terrorist whose decision-making process is described by prospect theory and who might, for example, seek to emulate or surpass the actions of a predecessor.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/S1514-0326(14)60006-4 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Journal Article: Prospect theory and terrorist choice (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:139-160

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/recs20

DOI: 10.1016/S1514-0326(14)60006-4

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Applied Economics is currently edited by Jorge M. Streb

More articles in Journal of Applied Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().