Regional Winners and Losers From Recent Trends in Utility Rationalization

Peter Gripaios Shaw and Max Munday

Regional Studies, 2000, vol. 33, issue 8, 769-778

Abstract: An important element of the economic strategy of successive UK governments since the early 1980s has been the privatization of state assets, especially the nationalized industries. Like a number of other policy initiatives introduced initially in the UK, this has been progessively adopted across other parts of the developed world in the following years. However, although there has been an extensive literature on such aspects of this movement as the forms of new ownership adopted, the costs and benefits to users, suppliers and taxpayers, and on the wider implications of these changes, the spatial dimensions to these developments have received relatively scant attention. The article by Peter Gripaios and Max Munday in this issue of Debates and Surveys attempts to explore not only the initial aspects of the privatization of the utilities, in particular, but also, more significantly, the recent trends in their subsequent rationalization. They demonstrate that there have been profound changes in all sectors, but that the biggest effects have been relatively concentrated at different levels in the urban hierarchy, with winners and losers located according to certain spatial factors. The further impacts of these changes on the ability of some regions to promote indigenous economic development echo much of the literature on branch plants, on the concentration of power in certain enterprises and localities, and on the vicious and virtuous circles of growth and decline.

Date: 2000
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343409950079214 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:regstd:v:33:y:2000:i:8:p:769-778

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CRES20

DOI: 10.1080/00343409950079214

Access Statistics for this article

Regional Studies is currently edited by Ivan Turok

More articles in Regional Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().