Arguing with Regions
John A. Agnew
Regional Studies, 2013, vol. 47, issue 1, 6-17
Abstract:
Agnew J. A. Arguing with regions, Regional Studies . An analytical survey of how regions have entered into the arguments of the social sciences serves to highlight the uses and limitations of different understandings of regions and their various theoretical biases. It also provides a way of introducing the articles in the rest of this special issue. It considers how regions have come to be used as a classificatory device across the social sciences, discusses the various meanings given to regions in empirical research, and examines the main philosophical and theoretical controversies that have been sparked by their use. Matching regions to purpose and avoiding a singular conception of 'region' that claims to fit all arguments are the main conclusions.
Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00343404.2012.676738 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:regstd:v:47:y:2013:i:1:p:6-17
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CRES20
DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2012.676738
Access Statistics for this article
Regional Studies is currently edited by Ivan Turok
More articles in Regional Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().