Which types of relatedness matter in regional growth? Industry, occupation and education
Sofia Wixe and
Martin Andersson ()
Regional Studies, 2017, vol. 51, issue 4, 523-536
Which types of relatedness matter in regional growth? Industry, occupation and education. Regional Studies. This paper provides a conceptual discussion of relatedness, which suggests a focus on individuals as a complement to firms and industries. The empirical relevance of the main arguments is tested by estimating the effects of related and unrelated variety in education and occupation among employees, as well as in industries, on regional growth. The results show that occupational and educational related variety are positively correlated with productivity growth, which supports the conceptual discussion put forth in the paper. In addition, related variety in industries is found to be negative for productivity growth, but positive for employment growth.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Which Types of Relatedness Matter in Regional Growth? -industry, occupation and education (2013)
Working Paper: Which Types of Relatedness Matter in Regional Growth? - Industry, occupation and education (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:regstd:v:51:y:2017:i:4:p:523-536
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Regional Studies is currently edited by Ivan Turok
More articles in Regional Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().