Does political conflict affect bilateral trade or vice versa? Evidence from Sino-U.S. relations
Chi-Wei Su,
Yu Song,
Ran Tao and
Lin-Na Hao
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 2020, vol. 33, issue 1, 3238-3257
Abstract:
This paper investigates the dynamic causal relationship between Sino-U.S. political conflict and bilateral trade using a time-varying (bootstrap) Granger full-sample causality test and sub-sample rolling window estimation. The result indicates that Sino-U.S. political conflict and bilateral trade may interact in various ways. Bilateral trade has both positive and negative effects on political conflict in several sub-phases, and in turn, political conflict has the same impacts on bilateral trade. In general, the relationship between Sino-U.S. political conflict and bilateral trade is not always consistent with the model of Polachek, which states bilateral trade has significantly reduced political conflict. In the face of a severe economic situation, China and the U.S. government should strengthen trade cooperation and seek common ground of economic interests in order to expand the improvement of political relations.
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1694559 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:33:y:2020:i:1:p:3238-3257
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rero20
DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2019.1694559
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja is currently edited by Marinko Skare
More articles in Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().