Party-state, nation, empire: rethinking the grammar of Chinese Governance
Vivienne Shue
Journal of Chinese Governance, 2018, vol. 3, issue 3, 268-291
Abstract:
Western political scientists, regarding China as a nation-state like any other, commonly classify it as a ‘party-state’ and as ‘authoritarian’. Yet China’s transition to modern statehood differed from that of almost every other postimperial or ‘new’ nation on the planet. Drawing on new scholarship in the history of empire and of modern China, this essay reflects on certain repercussions of the Sinic world’s singular experience of empire, imperial breakdown, and passage to political modernity. What light, we ask, can reexamining China’s oddly intact transfiguration—from dynastic empire to people’s republic—shed on how the Party has governed since 1949? With a view to tailoring an altered research agenda for political scientists today—one better fitted to grasping what Chinese authorities may mean when they refer to building ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics for a new era’—we consider, in particular, several techniques of governance associated with empire relating to scale and strategy, to hierarchy and differentiation.
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2018.1488495 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:3:y:2018:i:3:p:268-291
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rgov20
DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2018.1488495
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Chinese Governance is currently edited by Sujian Guo
More articles in Journal of Chinese Governance from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().