Countervailing Egos – Stigler Versus Galbraith

Craig Freedman

History of Economics Review, 1998, vol. 27, issue 1, 50-75

Abstract: I am reluctant to reply to Professor Stigler for I could seem to be urging the claims of my book against those of a very great classic. And I could conceivably be missing the deeper cause of Professor Stigler’s sorrow which may be not that so many read Galbraith and so few read Smith but that hardly anyone reads Stigler at all (Galbraith quoted in Hession, 1972, p. 89).

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10370196.1998.11733271 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:27:y:1998:i:1:p:50-75

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rher20

DOI: 10.1080/10370196.1998.11733271

Access Statistics for this article

History of Economics Review is currently edited by John Harry Bloch and John Hawkins

More articles in History of Economics Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().