The Irreducibly Social Self in Classical Economy: Adam Smith and Thomas Chalmers meet G.H. Mead

David Wilson and William Dixon

History of Economics Review, 2004, vol. 40, issue 1, 121-136

Abstract: The idea of a ‘natural harmony’ in human affairs runs like a leitmotif through Adam Smith’s work. Naturally enough, modern economics has read into this allusion its own preoccupations with the coordination of the strategic decisions of essentially egoistic actors. We will want to argue here, however, that for Smith and his disciple, Thomas Chalmers, successful human interaction is founded on a yet deeper competence and a more complex form of selfhood than conventional economic analysis has been able and/or willing to admit. We try to explicate that irreducibly social self that Smith and Chalmers have in mind by drawing on the philosophy of the act that characterises the work of the social psychologist, G.H. Mead.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/18386318.2004.11681194 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:40:y:2004:i:1:p:121-136

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rher20

DOI: 10.1080/18386318.2004.11681194

Access Statistics for this article

History of Economics Review is currently edited by John Harry Bloch and John Hawkins

More articles in History of Economics Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().