 Robinson, Andrews, and Marshall: A Case of Arguing at Cross Purposes?Lowell Jacobsen History of Economics Review, 2019, vol. 72, issue 1, 35-58 Abstract: The collected papers of Sir Austin Robinson held in Cambridge’s Marshall Library contain documents including correspondence that reveal Robinson’s steadfast opposition to the empirical work undertaken by the Oxford Economists’ Research Group (OERG) beginning in the 1930s. Robinson particularly took exception to the OERG’s flawed research methodology thereby casting doubt on the credibility of their findings that challenged traditional price theory. The collected papers of P. W. S. Andrews and Elizabeth Brunner held in the LSE’s Robbins Library contain lectures that reveal Andrews’s steadfast defence of the OERG’s work including his signature Manufacturing Business wherein he proffered his alternative normal cost theory. It is rather curious that two dedicated Marshallian industrial economists would maintain such adamant opposition until the end of their lives. Perhaps, it is a case of arguing at cross purposes? A neglected article by Alfred Marshall may offer some insight that disentangles both an ontological and epistemological difference between Robinson and Andrews. Date: 2019 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:72:y:2019:i:1:p:35-58 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1080/10370196.2019.1620136 Access Statistics for this article History of Economics Review is currently edited by John Harry Bloch and John Hawkins More articles in History of Economics Review from Taylor & Francis Journals |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.