Was Aquinas a ‘Universal Economist’?

Paolo Santori

History of Economics Review, 2019, vol. 72, issue 1, 79-91

Abstract: Many scholars claim that Thomas Aquinas (1225–74), in line with his master Aristotle, held a negative view of international trade and foreign merchants. The third chapter of the second book of De Regimine Principum is often invoked in support of this view. While there is an ongoing controversy regarding the author of the book, scholars claim that Aquinas criticized the moral corruption brought by merchants in the cities. I argue that this reading is incomplete, and that Aquinas did not truly hold that view. Conversely, I will show how Aquinas gave importance to international trade as a means for promoting friendship and virtue between peoples. This paper explores the possibility of regarding Aquinas as a ‘Universal Economist’, one among a group of pre-Modern thinkers who conceived international commerce as a means of Divine Providence for promoting wealth and friendship among nations.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10370196.2019.1658558 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:72:y:2019:i:1:p:79-91

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rher20

DOI: 10.1080/10370196.2019.1658558

Access Statistics for this article

History of Economics Review is currently edited by John Harry Bloch and John Hawkins

More articles in History of Economics Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().