EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Price Theory, Historically Considered: Smith, Ricardo, Marshall and Beyond

Harry Bloch

History of Economics Review, 2020, vol. 75, issue 1, 50-73

Abstract: Terminology is important. Price theory as the name given to the study of the determination of prices in markets reached ascendancy around the middle of the last century, having been little used at the start of the century and fading from use by the century’s end. Historically considering the theory of price determination from Smith to Ricardo, then to Marshall and beyond, not only reveals how changing terminology is related to the changing nature of the theory, but also identifies changes in the purposes the theory is attempting to achieve. Successive formulations embed different conceptions of what is being explained, which are reflected in the name given to the subject matter. The process is far from a straightforward exercise in improving the theory, with losses in what can be explained detracting from the purported gains in universality or precision.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10370196.2020.1745439 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:75:y:2020:i:1:p:50-73

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rher20

DOI: 10.1080/10370196.2020.1745439

Access Statistics for this article

History of Economics Review is currently edited by John Harry Bloch and John Hawkins

More articles in History of Economics Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:75:y:2020:i:1:p:50-73