Forbonnais’s and Graslin’s Attempted Explanations of ‘the Diamond-Water Paradox’ before Adam Smith
Eiko Yamamoto
History of Economics Review, 2020, vol. 76, issue 1, 58-71
Abstract:
This paper discusses F. V. D. de Forbonnais’s and J.-J.-L. Graslin’s value theories and examines their explanations of ‘the diamond-water paradox’. They criticized the physiocrat’s conceptual distinction between ‘productiveness’ and ‘sterility’ and discussed each theory of value. Forbonnais explained ‘the diamond-water paradox’ according to the assumption that ‘the natural order’ normally governed value of different goods based on essential utility for our existence. The capriciousness of the rich tends to weaken the function of the natural order. This behaviour is the cause of the high value of diamonds independently from the essential utility. Thus, Forbonnais emphasized the natural order and utility; nevertheless, Graslin’s explanation of the paradox was founded on the concepts of need, utility and scarcity from a subjective point of view, which has clear links to the marginalist revolution in the 1870s. Graslin provided a detailed explanation of the interaction between utility and scarcity, before Adam Smith’s distinction between what is called ‘value in use’ and ‘value in exchange’.
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10370196.2020.1766229 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:76:y:2020:i:1:p:58-71
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rher20
DOI: 10.1080/10370196.2020.1766229
Access Statistics for this article
History of Economics Review is currently edited by John Harry Bloch and John Hawkins
More articles in History of Economics Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().