Drop the Dead Donkey: A Response to Steven Kates on the Subject of Mill’s Fourth Proposition on Capital1
Roy H. Grieve
History of Economics Review, 2020, vol. 77, issue 1, 20-36
Abstract:
Steven Kates has recently attempted to explain and justify J. S. Mill’s paradoxical ‘Fourth Proposition on Capital’, which states that ‘demand for commodities is not demand for labour’, a proposition which notoriously – over generations – has baffled many eminent commentators. Kates intended to resolve the puzzle by offering ‘a proper understanding of Say’s Law as it was understood by Mill and his contemporaries’. Nevertheless, we conclude that Kates fails to justify Mill’s position, depending as it does on the (Say’s Law) proposition that it is the availability of the means of ‘putting labour into motion’, not demand for output, that is critical in determining employment and production. But Mill, on whose wisdom Kates relies, in his famous ‘recantation’ of the wages-fund doctrine himself undermined the fourth proposition on capital by allowing that demand for commodities actually can induce investment in the employment of labour. It is time for a recantation from Kates.
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10370196.2020.1784650 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:77:y:2020:i:1:p:20-36
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rher20
DOI: 10.1080/10370196.2020.1784650
Access Statistics for this article
History of Economics Review is currently edited by John Harry Bloch and John Hawkins
More articles in History of Economics Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().