 Measuring underemployment: does the cut-off point really matter?Guntur Sugiyarto Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 2008, vol. 13, issue 4, 481-517 Abstract: Unemployment and underemployment are the most pressing problems in Asia today, as reflected in the widespread underutilization rate of about 29% of the total labor force. Most labor forces in developing countries cannot afford to be completely unemployed and the standard labor force framework currently in use worldwide is biased toward counting the labor force as employed rather than unemployed. This systematically undervalues the full extent of the unemployment problem. The underemployment indicator is then introduced to overcome the issue but the existing guidelines for measuring time related-underemployment using the cut-off point for working full-time, set the threshold too low, resulting in the considerable under-representation of underemployment. This paper suggests a better way of determining the threshold using the cluster method. The robustness of its results is assessed and the overall results suggest that the proposed cut-off point of 40 working hours per week is the best one. Date: 2008 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rjapxx:v:13:y:2008:i:4:p:481-517 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1080/13547860802364786 Access Statistics for this article Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy is currently edited by Leong Liew More articles in Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy from Taylor & Francis Journals |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.