The Straight-Line Depreciation is Wanted, Dead or Alive

Danny Ben-Shahar, Yoram Margalioth and Eyal Sulganik

Journal of Real Estate Research, 2009, vol. 31, issue 3, 351-370

Abstract: We propose a simple axiomatic system that any depreciation method—complying with the core of the accounting of depreciation—must obey. We show that, while none of the prevalent depreciation methods (e.g., straight-line) ex ante conforms to these principles, the accredited proportional depreciation method not only maintains the axiomatic system, but also, for a plausible family of depreciation methods, is the unique method that complies with the axiomatic system. We further propose two consistency requirements of a depreciation method—partition consistency and dynamic consistency—and show that, in contrast to the commonly used methods, the proportional depreciation method is the only one to always sustain both. Our analysis may provide further resolution to the arguable evidence on the dominance of Funds From Operations over net income in measuring performance in the real estate industry.

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2009.12091257 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:31:y:2009:i:3:p:351-370

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rjer20

DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2009.12091257

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Real Estate Research is currently edited by William Hardin and Michael Seiler

More articles in Journal of Real Estate Research from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().