Planners in Publicly Traded Firms

Orly Linovski

Journal of the American Planning Association, 2023, vol. 89, issue 3, 376-388

Abstract: Problem, research strategy, and findingsDespite recent interest in the experiences of planners working in the private sector, much research does not distinguish between different organizational contexts. A key change in the consultancy market is the rise of global, publicly traded firms that provide planning services. This research draws on interviews with planners working in publicly traded firms to understand the opportunities and constraints from this model of practice. Though some planners noted opportunities in publicly traded firms, participants identified more constraints or limitations related to this model of practice. Scaling up of firm size offered benefits, such as opportunities for collaboration, but these were limited by organizational structures that promoted competition and cost-cutting strategies. Financial pressures and market demands can affect professional practice, such as through increased time spent on financial reporting and capacity issues from frequent turnover in staff. As a small, low-value component of traded firms, planners experienced issues with reduced resources, difficulties with staffing, and a lack of understanding the role of planning. A limitation of the research is that relying on self-reported data may not fully reflect ethical or professional breaches.Takeaway for practiceIncreased collaboration across disciplines and geographies may improve project outcomes, though planners’ concerns about lack of capacity and oversight point to concerns for the clients of consultants, as well as professional associations. There is a need for commissioning agencies, particularly in the public sector, to pay close attention to issues of procurement and develop strategies to evaluate project work. In firms where planning is a small business line and subordinate to more profitable services, there may be emerging ethical and practice issues that have not received sufficient attention in professional codes.

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01944363.2022.2093259 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:89:y:2023:i:3:p:376-388

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rjpa20

DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2022.2093259

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the American Planning Association is currently edited by Sandi Rosenbloom

More articles in Journal of the American Planning Association from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().