Searching for an Optimal Strategy for Identifying Files to Review for Fair Lending Analyses

Jason Dietrich

Journal of Housing Research, 2011, vol. 20, issue 2, 103-125

Abstract: During mortgage transactions, there is a risk that some customers will be charged higher pricing based solely on group membership. Identifying such disadvantaged customers is a primary objective for banking regulatory agencies. Whatever strategy is used, there is an inherent tradeoff between resource allocation and reliability of conclusions. While the likelihood of identifying all disadvantaged customers should be high, the rate at which non-disadvantaged customers are identified should be low. This study uses Monte Carlo simulation to analyze how six different strategies compare on these two performance measures. The results show that the optimal strategy with respect to maximizing reliability and minimizing cost depends on the likelihood and severity of disadvantage. Further, none of the strategies are highly successful at identifying disadvantaged applicants or minimizing the number of non-disadvantaged applicants reviewed.

Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2011.12092037 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rjrhxx:v:20:y:2011:i:2:p:103-125

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rjrh20

DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2011.12092037

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Housing Research is currently edited by Kimberly Goodwin

More articles in Journal of Housing Research from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().