Reconciling New Urbanist plans: plan quality evaluation for cities in Florida, U.S
Hyun Woo Kim and
International Journal of Urban Sciences, 2020, vol. 24, issue 4, 462-484
As the popularity of New Urbanism has grown, local governments have attempted to translate New Urbanist planning components into planning policy forms. Through observation of comprehensive plans in 40 cities in Florida, this paper explores the extent to which New Urbanism principles are embedded in terms of factual basis, goals, tools, intergovernmental coordination, and implementation. The outcomes of this study indicate that (1) the total quality of the plans varies by city; (2) local governments are well aware of the importance of New Urbanism; (3) there are weak links between the evaluation categories of factual basis and goals; (4) goals and objectives are addressed most effectively; (5) diversity and equity are relatively less addressed; and (6) proactive tools (e.g. form-based codes, transect zoning, or urban growth boundaries) are limited. The outcomes of this study are expected to benefit cities and improve their future plans by allowing the effective integration of New Urbanism depending on their own priorities.Highlights The mean plan quality score regarding New Urbanism for the 40 local comprehensive plans was 66.6 out of 100, while a large variation existed between local plan scores.Local governments are aware of the importance of New Urbanism principles, but not all the principles are reflected in local comprehensive plans.Inconsistencies existed between the factual bases and goals/objectives indicate that it is unclear how municipalities set their goals without documenting existing conditions.Relatively proactive tools like form-based codes, bans on suburban-style design, and transect zoning did not appear often.Diversity and equity are relatively less addressed in the factual bases, goals, and tools.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rjusxx:v:24:y:2020:i:4:p:462-484
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Urban Sciences is currently edited by Dongjoo Park and Mack Joong Choi
More articles in International Journal of Urban Sciences from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().