To move or not to move: mobility decision-making in the context of welfare conditionality and paid employment
Greg Marston,
Juan Zhang,
Michelle Peterie,
Gaby Ramia,
Roger Patulny and
Emma Cooke
Mobilities, 2019, vol. 14, issue 5, 596-611
Abstract:
The mobility and agency of the unemployed have rarely been examined together in welfare administration. Mobility research has much to offer the (im)mobility of low-skilled and unemployed workers. The article begins by critically examining dominant public discourse and policy reforms that stigmatise the assumed immobility of the unemployed. Drawing on empirical data from in-depth interviews with people on income support payments in Australia, it then offers a critical view on the mobility decision-making processes of these job-seekers. Building on previous research concerning the politics of mobility, it shows that structural inequalities impact mobility choices, making relocation difficult for many job-seekers. At the same time, it highlights the localised mobility that job search now involves, complicating orthodox associations between mobility and power – as well as assumptions that job-seekers are immobile.
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17450101.2019.1611016 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rmobxx:v:14:y:2019:i:5:p:596-611
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rmob20
DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2019.1611016
Access Statistics for this article
Mobilities is currently edited by Professor Kevin Hannam, Professor Mimi Sheller and Professor John Urry
More articles in Mobilities from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().