Davids and the Goliath at Downtown: why central Auckland’s largest post-war urban renewal scheme could not be stopped
Elizabeth Aitken Rose,
Julia Gatley and
Luciana Mota
Planning Perspectives, 2023, vol. 38, issue 1, 145-171
Abstract:
By the late 1960s, the recognition of community and heritage values increasingly led to the reconsideration of plans for comprehensive urban renewal projects that would have required the clearance of myriad old buildings. On the other hand, Auckland’s Downtown Redevelopment Scheme – New Zealand’s largest post-war urban renewal project of a commercial nature – was approved in 1968 and constructed in three stages until 1980. It was a subversion of the country’s first Professor of Town Planning, Robert Kennedy’s concept, and not resisted on heritage or community grounds. Objections focussed on the Stage 1 office building and the impairment of public amenity through increasing wind speeds at its base and shading the area earmarked for the Stage 2 public square. In two hearings, the Auckland City Council and the Town and Country Planning Appeal Board approved the planning application regardless, but the abiding outcomes confirmed the objections raised. The article seeks to understand the decisions made in a city still fashioning its planning processes and the accommodations made by all levels of government to facilitate the project before the hearings even took place – these effectively a foregone conclusion. Auckland has long been a commercial city, a developer’s city, despite extant planning processes.
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02665433.2022.2049355 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:38:y:2023:i:1:p:145-171
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rppe20
DOI: 10.1080/02665433.2022.2049355
Access Statistics for this article
Planning Perspectives is currently edited by Michael Hebbert
More articles in Planning Perspectives from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().