Symbolic state-building in contemporary Russia
Susanne Wengle and
Christine Evans
Post-Soviet Affairs, 2018, vol. 34, issue 6, 384-411
Abstract:
Vladimir Putin has made state-building a central goal of his presidency and recent scholarship has demonstrated that Russian formal institutions have indeed been deliberately reformed. Unlike studies that ass’ess state-building vis-à-vis a particular outcome, our research examines what kind of state Russian political elites seek to build, and focuses on symbolic state-building strategies. To capture symbolic state-building in the Putin era, we examine the Pryamaya Liniya broadcasts: annual, high-profile TV broadcasts in which citizens pose questions to the president. We find that a broad range of formal institutions appear to be central to Putin’s state-building project, a finding that runs counter to claims that governance is largely deinstitutionalized, informal and personal. We argue that symbolic state-building seeks to reconcile personalism and institutionalism, by conveying a dual image of a state in citizens’ everyday lives – emphasizing both formal institutions, while also affirming Putin as the personal guarantor of the state’s authority.
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1060586X.2018.1507409 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:34:y:2018:i:6:p:384-411
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rpsa20
DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2018.1507409
Access Statistics for this article
Post-Soviet Affairs is currently edited by Timothy Frye
More articles in Post-Soviet Affairs from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().