Pro-war hardline influencers in Putin’s regime in the context of Russia’s re-invasion of Ukraine

Martin Laryš

Post-Soviet Affairs, 2025, vol. 41, issue 4, 289-310

Abstract: This paper explores why Putin’s regime benefits from the activities of pro-war ultra-nationalist hardliners during the war against Ukraine despite their harsh criticism. While the regime appears stable and without significant opposition, these hardliners play a crucial role by advocating for more extreme measures and legitimizing the war effort. In exchange for their support, the regime permits controlled dissent on specific issues, such as immigration and ethnic minority policies. However, this relationship comes with risks, as some experts even suggest that these hardliners could become a threat to political stability or emerge as an opposition focal point. This paper argues that such scenarios are unlikely unless the regime collapses. Following Prigozhin’s failed mutiny, ultra-nationalist hardliners lack the capacity to seriously challenge the regime. The article examines the regime’s strategic use of hardliners and discusses the boundaries of their criticisms, which are tolerated within informal limits.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1060586X.2025.2509057 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:41:y:2025:i:4:p:289-310

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rpsa20

DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2025.2509057

Access Statistics for this article

Post-Soviet Affairs is currently edited by Timothy Frye

More articles in Post-Soviet Affairs from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().