Decarbonising national growth models: derisking, ‘hobbled states’, and the decarbonisation possibility frontier

Daniel Driscoll and Mark Blyth

Review of International Political Economy, 2025, vol. 32, issue 3, 617-642

Abstract: This article brings together Growth Model Theory and climate change under the assumption that economic growth will remain a policy priority during the green transition. The relevant research question from a Growth Model perspective thus becomes ‘how easy or difficult is it for specific Growth Models to switch from carbon-based growth to green growth?’ In answering this question, the article makes two main contributions. The first contribution is diagnostic and asks which states are best able to decarbonise given their underlying growth model type. It introduces a simple framework that clarifies the variation in decarbonisation capacity across national growth models using a macro comparison that combines a state’s cost of capital with the share of primary energy consumption from fossil fuels in its energy mix. The second contribution uses country case studies of Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom, France, and Poland to build upon recent scholarship that questions the capacity of different agents to affect the green transition. While many agree that the ‘Big Green State’ is the most effective actor to decarbonise, and might be right, what if a state, despite being big in terms of size and green in terms of ambition, is not very good at decarbonising?

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09692290.2025.2489770 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:617-642

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rrip20

DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2025.2489770

Access Statistics for this article

Review of International Political Economy is currently edited by Gregory Chin, Juliet Johnson, Daniel Mügge, Kevin Gallagher, Ilene Grabel and Cornelia Woll

More articles in Review of International Political Economy from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().