Types of Network Governance and Network Performance: Community Development Project Case

Hyung Jun Park and Min Jeong Park

International Review of Public Administration, 2009, vol. 13, issue 0, 91-105

Abstract: Many scholars have widely used the term “network” as a panacea to solve the problems faced by public management and collective policy. This broadly used term must be further defined. This study will begin defining types of network structure based on the networks’ characteristics. Our research maintains that network effectiveness for community development differs depending on the network structure. This study explores the popularity of collaborative network governance types in Korean local governance of community development. Our findings show that a type of government-leading network is the most popular. We found through a case analysis of the “Happy Korea” project that a local government with a public-private partnership network structure has a higher performance than other types of networks.

Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2009.10805142 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:13:y:2009:i:0:p:91-105

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RRPA20

DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2009.10805142

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Public Administration is currently edited by Ralph Brower

More articles in International Review of Public Administration from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().