EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Uncovering the Blurring of Sectors: A Comparison of Perceived Organizational Values between the Public and Nonprofit Sectors

Geon Lee

International Review of Public Administration, 2011, vol. 16, issue 3, 1-23

Abstract: It has long been recognized that the boundary between the public and nonprofit sectors is blurred because the top priority of agencies in both sectors is to serve the public interest, rather than to maximize the profits of agencies and stakeholders. This research attempts to highlight the differences between the sectors by comparing the perceptions of public sector and nonprofit employees with respect to flexibility, innovativeness, and red tape, taking sector switch into account. The empirical findings show that nonprofit organizations are perceived as more flexible and innovative, compared to private sector counterparts, and that the degree of red tape is greater in public sector organizations than in nonprofits. The public-nonprofit distinction can be accounted for by differences in the external environments of each sector. While public agencies are constrained by non-market environments such as political and legal authorities, nonprofits confront an economic environment. This study also suggests that employee experience in other sectors may influence perceptions of the organizational values of the sector in which the employee currently works.

Date: 2011
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2011.10805205 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:16:y:2011:i:3:p:1-23

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RRPA20

DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2011.10805205

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Public Administration is currently edited by Ralph Brower

More articles in International Review of Public Administration from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:16:y:2011:i:3:p:1-23