EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Public administration, social progress, and the utopian null: Reconfiguring the hypothesis test for neopragmatist bureaucracy

David Oliver Kasdan

International Review of Public Administration, 2016, vol. 21, issue 2, 163-175

Abstract: One way of conceptualizing a utopian society is through the liberal perspective, positing that policy should be cruelty-free and the role of governance is to facilitate social progress through improved justice. Public administration has implicitly supported this idea since the advent of New Public Administration and the inclusion of ‘equity’ as a pillar of governance. Justice serves as the foundation for determining a utopian notion of social progress, wherein our administrative decisions focus on moving us away from conditions of cruelty toward a fairer alternative. This article develops a path for public administration to approach an idea of utopia based on the neopragmatist philosophy of Richard Rorty. It envisions policy decisions framed as a ‘flipped’ hypothesis test, where the alternative hypothesis is the condition of cruelty we are currently experiencing and the null hypothesis is the policy aimed to alleviate conditions of cruelty and facilitate social progress.

Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2016.1186456 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:21:y:2016:i:2:p:163-175

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RRPA20

DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2016.1186456

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Public Administration is currently edited by Ralph Brower

More articles in International Review of Public Administration from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:21:y:2016:i:2:p:163-175