EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Critical Review on The Administrative Reforms in The Korean Central Government: A Case Study of The Kim Dae-Jung Administration

Chang-Won Lee

International Review of Public Administration, 2004, vol. 9, issue 1, 113-120

Abstract: Since central government reforms form a substantial part of the overall reform efforts, this paper critically evaluates the administrative reforms of the Korean central government implemented by the Kim Dae-jung Administration from the time of his inauguration in 1998 until February 2001. The paper is composed of four parts: 1) identification of the major reform measures, 2) evaluation of the reform logic, 3) evaluation of the major reform measures, and 4) evaluation of the major reform processes and steps. Although it appears that the administrative restructuring by the Kim Dae-jung Administration has been based on neo-liberalism, it is debatable whether the administrative reforms of Kim Dae-jung’s administration truly captured the ideas of neo-liberalism. Contrary to what might be expected, the administrative reforms of Kim Dae-jung’s administration were mainly based on development-centered administrative principles combined with populism and political rhetoric. As a consequence, the reforms lost consistency and floundered. The reform agenda was monopolized by the Office of Government Reform (OGR) or some similar organizations (committees) and implemented in a top-down manner. The Korean government has implemented about fifty structural reforms at the central level up to now. Despite all these reforms, the Korean government is still criticized for rigidity and under-performance. Therefore, now is the time to realize that structural reforms are not the goal of administrative reforms but a tool to enhance the performance of the government. One of the most important functions of the government is to build up the system to consistently implement administrative reforms.

Date: 2004
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2004.10805043 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:9:y:2004:i:1:p:113-120

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RRPA20

DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2004.10805043

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Public Administration is currently edited by Ralph Brower

More articles in International Review of Public Administration from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:9:y:2004:i:1:p:113-120