The domestic transfer pricing practices of large listed South African industrial companies

I Vally

South African Journal of Accounting Research, 1998, vol. 12, issue 1, 47-72

Abstract: The three main objectives of a domestic transfer pricing system are: (1) the attainment of goal congruence, (2) the facilitation of fair divisional performance evaluation and (3) the promotion of divisional autonomy.The transfer pricing objective considered most important in practice by large listed South African industrial companies is the facilitation of fair divisional performance evaluation. Objectives relating to simplicity and ease of application are also rated more highly than goal congruence, which is somewhat surprising based on the review of current literature.The domestic transfer pricing methods used by large listed South African industrial companies are fairly evenly split between cost and non-cost-oriented methods. The most frequently used primary transfer pricing method is market price. The use of mathematical programming and economic marginal cost prices is practically non-existent. These findings are consistent with the findings of some recent overseas studies.Policies relating to the selection of the transfer pricing method, the purchase of intermediate goods and services and the settlement of transfer pricing disputes reflect some head office management involvement in the transfer price decision process in most cases.Three organisational variables appear to have a significant association with a firm’s choice of transfer pricing method. Firstly, companies with a low level of interdivisional trading use non-cost-oriented transfer pricing methods whereas companies with a high level of interdivisional trading use cost-oriented methods. Secondly, transfer pricing methods selected as a result of some head office management involvement tend to be cost-oriented whereas methods selected by the divisions themselves tend to be non-cost-oriented. Thirdly, cost-oriented methods tend to be used in companies in which transfer pricing disputes are normally settled by some form of head office intervention and non-cost oriented methods are used in those companies in which disputes are normally settled by the divisions themselves.

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.1998.11435079 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:12:y:1998:i:1:p:47-72

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rsar20

DOI: 10.1080/10291954.1998.11435079

Access Statistics for this article

South African Journal of Accounting Research is currently edited by Soon Nel

More articles in South African Journal of Accounting Research from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().