EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Decision to Adopt and the Intensity of Adoption of Technology: A Double Hurdle Model Application in the Adoption of a Sorghum Hybrid

T Nichola

Studies in Economics and Econometrics, 1996, vol. 20, issue 3, 49-57

Abstract: This paper argues that the double-hurdle model is more appropriate to identify the socioeconomic variables that influence adoption when agricultural technologies are scarce. In such cases the variables identified by probit or tobit models may confound the ability to acquire the scarce technology with the motivation to adopt. The double-hurdle model precludes this problem by separating the adoption process in two stages, the decision to adopt, and the decision on the degree of use of the technology. Estimating the two “hurdles” separately provides additional insight into the data. This is illustrated with the adoption of a sorghum hybrid in Sudan. The empirical results show that the decision to adopt and the decision on the intensity of adoption is explained by different sets of variables. The policy implications of this outcome are highlighted.

Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03796205.1996.12129100 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:20:y:1996:i:3:p:49-57

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rsee20

DOI: 10.1080/03796205.1996.12129100

Access Statistics for this article

Studies in Economics and Econometrics is currently edited by Willem Bester

More articles in Studies in Economics and Econometrics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:20:y:1996:i:3:p:49-57