The Role of Sample Size in Testing a Hypothesis in Complex Cross-Sectional Studies: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study
P A E Serumaga-Zake and
R Arnab
Studies in Economics and Econometrics, 2008, vol. 32, issue 2, 63-68
Abstract:
In this study, we explore the relationship among sample size, variability of a variable, power of the statistical test and effect size in complex cross-sectional studies.The argument that power analysis can be used to optimize the resource usage through determining the smallest sample size needed for a study to assess the detectable effect size has been found questionable. It is worse when dealing with independent variables, which have more than two groups to be compared because the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis keep on changing with the sample size. Any population mean difference, so long as it is absolutely not equal to zero, can be found statistically significant depending on the sample size, holding other factors constant. The study suggests that, in complex cross-sectional studies, it is very difficult, if not impossible, to determine the appropriate sample size for a hypothesis test in the planning stage of a study.
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10800379.2008.12106450 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:32:y:2008:i:2:p:63-68
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rsee20
DOI: 10.1080/10800379.2008.12106450
Access Statistics for this article
Studies in Economics and Econometrics is currently edited by Willem Bester
More articles in Studies in Economics and Econometrics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().