EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Discursive delegitimisation of athlete activism: a study of the Australian football team

Francis O’Neill, Ashleigh-Jane Thompson, Geoff Dickson and Tim Ströbel

Sport Management Review, 2025, vol. 28, issue 4, 823-850

Abstract: Athlete activism is increasingly visible and polarising. However, little is known in sport management research about the strategies, which opponents use to neutralise athlete activists. Discursive delegitimisation refers to the public discourse, which seeks to undermine activist legitimacy and challenge the meaning of activist actions. Prior to 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar, 16 members of the Australian football team released a video via social media criticising Qatar’s human rights record with migrant workers and the LGBTQIA+ community. A content analysis was conducted of 5,844 social media comments on this video to examine the delegitimisation strategies employed by critics of this athlete activism. Findings illustrate nine forms of online discursive delegitimisation strategies. Those consistent with previous research were: 1) Stigmatising the athletes; 2) Authorisation; 3) Emphasising negative consequences; 4) Attributing new meaning to the activism; 5) Moral Evaluation; 6) Rationalisation; and 7) Mythopoesis. Two new strategies were identified: 8) Implying the athletes are disingenuous; and 9) arguing the activism is a distraction. This research demonstrates that online communities use social media to not only discuss and react to athlete activism, but to actively counteract and neutralise it. This study contributes to athlete activism research by conceptualising an integrative framework of discursive delegitimisation strategies in elite sport. As public perceptions closely align with sports marketing and branding efforts, this research has managerial implications to help athletes to avoid and overcome negative public perceptions and encourage their activism. Athletes and managers may be able to adjust their activist efforts to reduce delegitimisation.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14413523.2025.2514864 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:28:y:2025:i:4:p:823-850

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rsmr20

DOI: 10.1080/14413523.2025.2514864

Access Statistics for this article

Sport Management Review is currently edited by Sheranne Fairley

More articles in Sport Management Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-08-05
Handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:28:y:2025:i:4:p:823-850