Economics: Unfit for Purpose*
Ben Fine
Review of Social Economy, 2013, vol. 71, issue 3, 373-389
Abstract:
This paper is a shortened and revised version of the Closing Plenary given to the World Congress of the Association of Social Economics, and Cairncross Lecture, University of Glasgow, June 2012. Mainstream economics is seen as unfit for purpose because of deficiencies that have long been criticised by a marginalised heterodoxy. These include the taking out of the historical and social even if bringing them back in on the basis of a technical apparatus and architecture that is sorely inappropriate. These observations are illustrated in passing reference to social capital but are particularly appropriate for understanding the weakness of ethics within mainstream economics. An alternative is offered through taking various "entanglements" (such as facts and values) as critical point of departure, leading to the suggestion that ethical systems are subject to the 10 Cs-Constructed, Construed, Conforming, Commodified, Contextual, Contradictory, Closed, Contested, Collective and Chaotic.
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00346764.2013.799969 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rsocec:v:71:y:2013:i:3:p:373-389
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RRSE20
DOI: 10.1080/00346764.2013.799969
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Social Economy is currently edited by Wilfred Dolfsma and John Davis
More articles in Review of Social Economy from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().