The confounding problem of the counterfactual in economic explanation*

George F. DeMartino

Review of Social Economy, 2022, vol. 80, issue 2, 127-137

Abstract: Economists who have emphasized uncertainty have tended to draw a sharp epistemic distinction between an ascertainable past and an unknowable future. But in one critical respect – in extracting causal relationships – the epistemic distinction is unsustainable. Many types of causal arguments in economics depend on counterfactual reasoning. Counterfactualizing entails the construction of fictions about what would have happened or would happen in the world absent an event that is taken to be causal. But that alternative world is foreclosed the moment the causal event occurs. Complicating matters, there is no dependable method for ascertaining the uniquely true counterfactual. Distinct research methods, and distinct economic paradigms, generate alternative plausible counterfactual accounts. This implies that causal claims in economics, too, are irreducibly fictitious – regardless of whether the subject matter concerns the past, or the future.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00346764.2020.1735649 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rsocec:v:80:y:2022:i:2:p:127-137

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RRSE20

DOI: 10.1080/00346764.2020.1735649

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Social Economy is currently edited by Wilfred Dolfsma and John Davis

More articles in Review of Social Economy from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().