Evidence-based research, epidemiology and alcohol policy: a critique

Alfred Uhl

Contemporary Social Science, 2015, vol. 10, issue 2, 221-231

Abstract: To demand 'evidence-based medicine' and 'evidence-based research' has become almost a dogma for researchers and policy-makers in Western cultures. A critical analysis shows that the original intention of the term 'evidence-based' was to aim to use the best existing evidence (emphasising that research should be planned and interpreted in a methodologically correct way), while recognising that, in some areas, experimental research would be neither sensible nor feasible. However, as the paradigm has become established, three dubious and commonly coexisting additional connotations have become prominent in practice: 'proven beyond doubt', 'exclusively relying on experimental research' and 'any conclusions based on empirical data'. Drawing on examples from renowned publications that demand an 'evidence-based alcohol policy', this article argues that much of what is presented as 'evidence-based policy' should more appropriately be labelled 'policy-based evidence'.

Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2015.1051578 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:10:y:2015:i:2:p:221-231

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rsoc21

DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2015.1051578

Access Statistics for this article

Contemporary Social Science is currently edited by Professor David Canter

More articles in Contemporary Social Science from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().