World disorder and peace research: a sociological, post-nationalist reading of the pathway to sustainable peace
Romina Gurashi
Contemporary Social Science, 2022, vol. 17, issue 1, 63-76
Abstract:
This paper offers a sociological reading of the concept of world order within the peace research debate, mindful of the complexity of systemic factors that influence changing interpretations. By addressing the clash of thought currents that have seen ‘traditionalist’ peace researchers interpret peace as a phenomenon opposed to conflict, while ‘progressive’ researchers view it as a social and sustainable development capable of mitigating conflict while containing disruptive aspects, this study critically reconstructs utopian conflict theories within a complex mosaic, which leads from conflict to a new vision of a peaceful world. In this view, there is no longer room for a concept of world order as expression of an arbitrary system of dominance, but a tendency to read social reality through the lenses of the complexity theories as a worldwide disorder. Following giants such as Kenneth Boulding and Johan Galtung, this paper investigates the four interconnected pillars of the new worldview – peace, society, economy, and nature – and the role played by conflict in defining its identity. Pursuing a vision that seeks to recompose the contents of positive peace and sustainable development, the researcher will try to understand the direction taken by the new sustainability paradigms.
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2021.1942183 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:17:y:2022:i:1:p:63-76
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rsoc21
DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2021.1942183
Access Statistics for this article
Contemporary Social Science is currently edited by Professor David Canter
More articles in Contemporary Social Science from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().