Public spaces in land use rating based on participatory mapping

Anastasiia Galaktionova

Urban Research & Practice, 2022, vol. 15, issue 4, 641-650

Abstract: The paper presents citizens’ attitude to public spaces, which is a central topic in contemporary urban planning. Provided that the research concerning public spaces is rarely based on participatory methods, the paper introduces new quantitative data into scholarly research. Geo-located markers of positive and negative places, as well as proposals, were filtered through the city cadastre. The rating based on the quantitative comparison of spaces and places adds new insights to the existing body of knowledge. Providing statistically significant samples, participatory mapping allows comparing the impacts of public spaces, and thus, creates a perspective for urban planners and city authorities.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17535069.2022.2106037 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rurpxx:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:641-650

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rurp20

DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2022.2106037

Access Statistics for this article

Urban Research & Practice is currently edited by Professor Rob Atkinson

More articles in Urban Research & Practice from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().